검색
검색 팝업 닫기

Ex) Article Title, Author, Keywords

JKFN Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition



Online ISSN 2288-5978

Article

home All Articles View

Article

Split Viewer

Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 2018; 47(6): 620-628

Published online June 30, 2018

Copyright © The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition.

Comparison of Food Components in Enzymatic Oyster Hydrolysates according to the Processing Conditions

Su-Seon Lee1, Nam-Gil Kim2, and Yeung Joon Choi3

1Innovative Technology Lab Co., Ltd.; 2Department of Aquaculture and Life Science/Institute of Marine Industry and 3Department of Seafood Science and Technology/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University

Abstract

This study examined the effects of different processing, microbial transglutaminase treatments before Protamex-Neutrase hydrolysis (TGPN), glycoside-linkage hydrolysis (PNA) and yeast treatment after Protamex-Neutrase hydrolysis (PNY), on the nutritional properties of oyster hydrolysates compared to standard Protamex-Neutrase processing (PN). The 280 nm to 220 nm absorption ratio in the range of 100∼1,000 Da was highest in TGPN hydrolysate, and lowest in PNY hydrolysate. The major amino acids of the hydrolysates were aspartic acid, glutamic acid, leucine and lysine. The proline level of PN was high, whereas that of PNY was low compared to those of TGPN and PNA. In the free amino acid composition, TGPN and PNA had a high phenylalanine and taurine content, respectively, whereas PNY had a high hydroxyproline content. The Fe, Cu, and Zn levels of TGPN were approximately 6.2, 1.8, and 2.0 times those of PN. Above 20 mg hydrolysate/mL, the water solubility was high in the order of PNA> TGPN≒PNY> PN. An increase in NaCl concentration did not influence the solubility of the hydrolysates, whereas pH influenced the solubility of the hydrolysates slightly except for PN. These results suggest that slightly different processing is responsible for the peptide size, total and free amino acid composition, and mineral composition. As a result, different compositions of the hydrolysates might affect the bioactivity as healthy foods. Therefore, it is important to investigate the different functionalities derived from different processes through bioactive assays.

Keywords: oyster hydrolysate, processing condition, amino acid, mineral, solubility

Article

Article

Journal of the Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition 2018; 47(6): 620-628

Published online June 30, 2018

Copyright © The Korean Society of Food Science and Nutrition.

제조공정의 차이에 의한 굴 효소 가수분해물의 성분조성 비교

Comparison of Food Components in Enzymatic Oyster Hydrolysates according to the Processing Conditions

Su-Seon Lee*1, Nam-Gil Kim*2, and Yeung Joon Choi*3

*1Innovative Technology Lab Co., Ltd.; *2Department of Aquaculture and Life Science/Institute of Marine Industry and *3Department of Seafood Science and Technology/Institute of Marine Industry, Gyeongsang National University

Abstract

This study examined the effects of different processing, microbial transglutaminase treatments before Protamex-Neutrase hydrolysis (TGPN), glycoside-linkage hydrolysis (PNA) and yeast treatment after Protamex-Neutrase hydrolysis (PNY), on the nutritional properties of oyster hydrolysates compared to standard Protamex-Neutrase processing (PN). The 280 nm to 220 nm absorption ratio in the range of 100∼1,000 Da was highest in TGPN hydrolysate, and lowest in PNY hydrolysate. The major amino acids of the hydrolysates were aspartic acid, glutamic acid, leucine and lysine. The proline level of PN was high, whereas that of PNY was low compared to those of TGPN and PNA. In the free amino acid composition, TGPN and PNA had a high phenylalanine and taurine content, respectively, whereas PNY had a high hydroxyproline content. The Fe, Cu, and Zn levels of TGPN were approximately 6.2, 1.8, and 2.0 times those of PN. Above 20 mg hydrolysate/mL, the water solubility was high in the order of PNA> TGPN≒PNY> PN. An increase in NaCl concentration did not influence the solubility of the hydrolysates, whereas pH influenced the solubility of the hydrolysates slightly except for PN. These results suggest that slightly different processing is responsible for the peptide size, total and free amino acid composition, and mineral composition. As a result, different compositions of the hydrolysates might affect the bioactivity as healthy foods. Therefore, it is important to investigate the different functionalities derived from different processes through bioactive assays.

Keywords: oyster hydrolysate, processing condition, amino acid, mineral, solubility